10. Internos do Git
3.1 Ramificação do Git - Branches in a Nutshell
Quase todos os VCS possuem alguma forma de suporte de ramificação. Ramificação significa que tu diverges da linha principal de desenvolvimento e continuas a fazer o trabalho sem mexer com esta linha principal. Em muitas ferramentas VCS, este é um processo um pouco caro, muitas vezes exigindo que tu cries uma nova cópia do teu diretório de código-fonte, que pode demorar muito para grandes projetos.
Algumas pessoas referem-se ao modelo de ramificação do Git como “recurso assassino”, e certamente separa o Git na comunidade VCS. Por que é tão especial? A maneira que o Git ramifica é incrivelmente leve, tornando as operações de ramificação quase instantâneas, e alternando entre os ramos é geralmente tão rápido. Ao contrário de muitos outros VCSs, o Git incentiva os fluxos de trabalho que se ramificam e mesclam com freqüência, mesmo várias vezes num dia. Compreender e dominar este recurso oferece-te uma ferramenta poderosa e única e pode mudar completamente a maneira como tu desenvolves.
Branches in a Nutshell
To really understand the way Git does branching, we need to take a step back and examine how Git stores its data.
As you may remember from Começando, Git doesn’t store data as a series of changesets or differences, but instead as a series of snapshots.
When you make a commit, Git stores a commit object that contains a pointer to the snapshot of the content you staged. This object also contains the author’s name and email, the message that you typed, and pointers to the commit or commits that directly came before this commit (its parent or parents): zero parents for the initial commit, one parent for a normal commit, and multiple parents for a commit that results from a merge of two or more branches.
To visualize this, let’s assume that you have a directory containing three files, and you stage them all and commit. Staging the files computes a checksum for each one (the SHA-1 hash we mentioned in Começando), stores that version of the file in the Git repository (Git refers to them as blobs), and adds that checksum to the staging area:
$ git add README test.rb LICENSE $ git commit -m 'The initial commit of my project'
When you create the commit by running
git commit, Git checksums each subdirectory (in this case, just the root project directory) and stores those tree objects in the Git repository.
Git then creates a commit object that has the metadata and a pointer to the root project tree so it can re-create that snapshot when needed.
Your Git repository now contains five objects: one blob for the contents of each of your three files, one tree that lists the contents of the directory and specifies which file names are stored as which blobs, and one commit with the pointer to that root tree and all the commit metadata.
If you make some changes and commit again, the next commit stores a pointer to the commit that came immediately before it.
A branch in Git is simply a lightweight movable pointer to one of these commits.
The default branch name in Git is
As you start making commits, you’re given a
master branch that points to the last commit you made.
Every time you commit, it moves forward automatically.
The “master” branch in Git is not a special branch.
It is exactly like any other branch.
The only reason nearly every repository has one is that the
Creating a New Branch
What happens if you create a new branch?
Well, doing so creates a new pointer for you to move around.
Let’s say you create a new branch called testing.
You do this with the
git branch command:
$ git branch testing
This creates a new pointer to the same commit you’re currently on.
How does Git know what branch you’re currently on?
It keeps a special pointer called
Note that this is a lot different than the concept of
HEAD in other VCSs you may be used to, such as Subversion or CVS.
In Git, this is a pointer to the local branch you’re currently on.
In this case, you’re still on
git branch command only created a new branch — it didn’t switch to that branch.
You can easily see this by running a simple
git log command that shows you where the branch pointers are pointing.
This option is called
$ git log --oneline --decorate f30ab (HEAD -> master, testing) add feature #32 - ability to add new formats to the central interface 34ac2 Fixed bug #1328 - stack overflow under certain conditions 98ca9 The initial commit of my project
You can see the “master” and “testing” branches that are right there next to the
To switch to an existing branch, you run the
git checkout command.
Let’s switch to the new
$ git checkout testing
HEAD to point to the
What is the significance of that? Well, let’s do another commit:
$ vim test.rb $ git commit -a -m 'made a change'
This is interesting, because now your
testing branch has moved forward, but your
master branch still points to the commit you were on when you ran
git checkout to switch branches.
Let’s switch back to the
$ git checkout master
That command did two things.
It moved the HEAD pointer back to point to the
master branch, and it reverted the files in your working directory back to the snapshot that
master points to.
This also means the changes you make from this point forward will diverge from an older version of the project.
It essentially rewinds the work you’ve done in your
testing branch so you can go in a different direction.
Switching branches changes files in your working directory
It’s important to note that when you switch branches in Git, files in your working directory will change. If you switch to an older branch, your working directory will be reverted to look like it did the last time you committed on that branch. If Git cannot do it cleanly, it will not let you switch at all.
Let’s make a few changes and commit again:
$ vim test.rb $ git commit -a -m 'made other changes'
Now your project history has diverged (see Divergent history).
You created and switched to a branch, did some work on it, and then switched back to your main branch and did other work.
Both of those changes are isolated in separate branches: you can switch back and forth between the branches and merge them together when you’re ready.
And you did all that with simple
You can also see this easily with the
git log command.
If you run
git log --oneline --decorate --graph --all it will print out the history of your commits, showing where your branch pointers are and how your history has diverged.
$ git log --oneline --decorate --graph --all * c2b9e (HEAD, master) made other changes | * 87ab2 (testing) made a change |/ * f30ab add feature #32 - ability to add new formats to the * 34ac2 fixed bug #1328 - stack overflow under certain conditions * 98ca9 initial commit of my project
Because a branch in Git is actually a simple file that contains the 40 character SHA-1 checksum of the commit it points to, branches are cheap to create and destroy. Creating a new branch is as quick and simple as writing 41 bytes to a file (40 characters and a newline).
This is in sharp contrast to the way most older VCS tools branch, which involves copying all of the project’s files into a second directory. This can take several seconds or even minutes, depending on the size of the project, whereas in Git the process is always instantaneous. Also, because we’re recording the parents when we commit, finding a proper merge base for merging is automatically done for us and is generally very easy to do. These features help encourage developers to create and use branches often.
Let’s see why you should do so.